for i'm sure avast's siren was wailing as well.Īvast currently offers up to 7 "providers" - which is their terminology for the various protection "components" of their program. fortunately for me, as i was visiting family, i had disabled sound. However, as above, I do praise them for their swift response once the problem was reported.įor those who didn't experience it first hand, in many ways, it was worse than popup-bombarding adware: every time i clicked to open a yahoo e-mail, avast's web shield - believing it was saving me from potential danger - intercepted and blocked the page from being opened/viewed. ideally, in-house (before the database was released to the public). that avast testers did not discover this problem sooner. Given the popularity of sites such as yahoo mail, I'm very surprised. at which time they promised to take extreme care to be sure there would never be a repeat of such an event. Yes, it was quite disconcerting to see that avast was culpable of another false positive, given the grave magnitude of their recent f/p incident.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |